Welcome Guest!
Search
My Sites
Navigation Links
Copyright
All music on benbarden.com is free to share for non-commercial use only. Please see the music pages for more information.
All other content: Copyright © 2009 Ben Barden.
All Rights Reserved.
Content written by authors besides Ben Barden.
Pages: 1
This is a guest post from Rebecca Leaman. She writes on nonprofit technology and web 2.0 topics for the Wild Apricot Blog, and doubles as 'Jen/domestika' at Domestik Goddess and on the Authority Blogger forum.
I’ve been test-driving Woopra this week, and re-reading the novels of Ernest Hemingway. Strange, how two such different activities can join to teach a key lesson in writing web content that travels — those blog posts that people go out of their way to share.
Woopra is a real-time site stats program with what I’d consider a needlessly complex interface for most bloggers’ purposes; and it’s dangerously addictive, so I probably won’t continue to use it for long. But there is a very cool feature: “tagged visitors.” After someone comments on your blog, his subsequent visits are tagged with his name, rather than Visitor #1897 or such.
It feels a bit voyeuristic, to identify individual visitors without so much as a Whois lookup. But it also makes it easy to distinguish between the actions of two very different types of visitors.
On the one blog I’ve got Woopra-enabled, visitors who found it through a search engine results page (SERP) showed a 94% bounce rate, <1% rate of return visits, and an average page view of 1.2 with less than 20 seconds on site. Granted, a one-week trial is hardly scientific — but it was the comparison with tagged visitors that really made a lightbulb come on for me: Tagged visitors to the blog, on average, checked in 3 times during the week, and averaged 3.2 minutes and 6.7 page views each time.
Those numbers aren’t a great surprise — after all, SERPs traffic tends to be people on a mission to solve a specific problem; maybe they find their answer on your blog, or they don’t, but either way they usually click on through. And that’s dandy, if your blogging goal is to get a high volume of traffic onto your site and off again by way of a high-CTR advertisement.
But what if you’re trying to build a community of loyal readers, to establish yourself and your site as a go-to expert resource on your niche topic, or to promote your own products, skills and professional services with your blog?
Search engine visitors are unlikely to stop their search long enough to truly engage with your writing. A focused seeker doesn’t have time (or motivation) to Digg your post, share it in Google Reader or on Facebook, StumbleUpon it, Mixx it, Sphinn it, or bookmark in del.icio.us, annotate it with Diigo, tweet it on Twitter or promote on Plurk, feed the RSS to countless other sites, or link back to it in a blog post… unless you can draw them in on that very first visit, and make a real connection.
That’s where Hemingway comes in.
The man’s been dead for almost 5 decades now, yet his books still sell across the world. Several were published after his death, in fact — including Islands in the Stream, the novel I stayed up late last night to finish, despite a very limited interest in hunting WWII submarines off the coast of Cuba. And then there were the films and television adaptations…
That, my friends, is content that travels.
Just google Hemingway: in those SERPs, you’ll see countless references to his rules for writing (as interpreted by CopyBlogger) and the famous 6-word short story :
For sale: baby shoes, never used.
Hemingway’s emphasis on tight, to-the-point prose fits right in with the much-repeated advice on how to blog, doesn’t it? You know the drill: 250-500 words per post, sprinkled with high-demand keywords, typographical emphasis (headings, bold, italics, etc.) on keywords, repeat as often as possible to keep search engines crawling your site in expectation of fresh content… and that advice still holds, for the most part.
But tight prose doesn’t have to mean a short post. The old 250-500 word count rule was based on the needs of search engines, not on human preferences. This may be Web 2.0 but we are only just starting to let go of the idea that posts must be bite-sized to travel. In fact, more often, the opposite is true.
Take a moment and delve into the popular social bookmark sites. Aside from the breaking news stories, what’s been saved and stumbled most often? Check your own site stats and see which of your posts rank high for referrals by a direct link or social media site. You may be surprised…
Start with a story worth telling, grab your reader in the first few lines, and keep it moving along. Yes, do keep in mind the keywords that will help searchers find your post in the first place (because the travelling has to start somewhere!) and please, yes, do break up a long page of solid text into small chunks that are easy on the eyes. It all helps to invite the visitor to pause and read.
In the end, however, content will only travel if it pays its own way — if the reader comes away feeling that he’s had good value for the time invested.
Hemingway knew that, just as thoroughly as he knew deep-sea fishing, hard drinking, and the torments of genius. And I’ll bet a cold mojito that your blog analytics will tell the same story.
This is a guest post by Vincent Tan, a fellow technical person who writes about programming and mathematics at Polymath Programmer.
You've read Ben's beginner's guide to HTML. You've read his guide to FTP too. Maybe you've tried to wrap your head around the explanations. Perhaps you've even succeeded (I certainly hope so). Possibly you've tried to understand what you could, and just follow along.
But something's gnawing at your heart. Something insidious is eating away your sanity. Something is making you fling your hands up in despair. You just want to blog. Why is there so much technical jargon?
The Internet started off as a network for scientists to communicate and share ideas. Then the big companies wanted in too, and corporate sites and e-commerce sites were built. Then people like you wanted to build your own sites, but the barrier to entry was too high. You needed to learn HTML, CSS, and other weird technical terms.
Basically you needed to be a technical person, a programmer or web designer. And so the initial personal sites were mostly by people with technical knowledge. You just contented yourself with consuming information.
Then the tides turned. Those technical people decided if they're the only ones building sites and contributing information, it's going to be boring (not to mention tedious). So they wrote software so people with less technical knowledge can join too. TypePad, WordPress, Injader and other content management systems and blogging software were created.
Next came the ability to share music and audio files on sites such as Last.fm or start your own podcast. You can also upload videos on YouTube and Vimeo. Text, images, audio and video. You can now create all of them, without knowing a lot about the actual innards of site creation.
You're not just a consumer of information anymore; you're a publisher too.
Yet an uneasy feeling caresses your heart, teasing you, taunting you. And when you least expect it, it strikes fear into your very being. Face it, you're just plain scared of the computer sometimes.
Out of mankind's inventions, the computer is one of the most versatile and useful ones, yet it's seemingly arcane. I mean, you push a button and off goes an email. Or a movie ticket is bought. You can even talk to someone on the other side of the globe with it.
And the only people who really understand, are the technical people. And you're not one of them. And that scares you.
They've got years of experience working with computers and related technologies. They've probably had years of academic study too. That makes technical people smart, in the sense that they can figure out solutions for blogging, web design and one of them nifty widget thingies.
You're smart too and you've got your own jargon. You a chef? Julienning. You a doctor? Myocardial infarction. You a stock analyst? Bull market.
The reason why you're hip-deep in technical jargon even though you just want to blog is, you are hip-deep in the technological world. Remember the Internet scientists? You don't feel much of the technical stuff because those very same technical people are working very hard to create the perception that blogging is easy.
So why are there still so much technical jargon? Because...
New concepts get created. New gadgets get made. And the new technology needs to be named. Thus a new term is spawned, with much congratulations and back-patting amongst the techno people (yes, it's an embarrassing failing...). Poor you have to deal with the new jargon.
What can you do? Just ask. That's why there are people like Ben around. Sure, there are wicked, evil, rude and arrogant technical people. Just as there are impassive doctors or unfriendly waiters. You just have to know who to ask (here, click here).
Do you fear technology?
Are you scared of asking for technical help?
What's your niche? What are your jargon?
At its core, BlogCatalog is a directory of blogs. They expanded on the commonplace form to include many social media style features. You can add friends, join neighborhoods, read RSS feeds, and message contacts effortlessly. This adds to the appeal of BlogCatalog as opposed to standard directories.
A neighborhood for your blog represents your site's footprint inside the BlogCatalog community. When visitors find your site through the network, they can join your neighborhood. Inside your neighborhood page, they can read your recent posts, view other members, and post comment/reviews about your blog.
Those who join the neighborhood would rightfully be seen as fans of the site. While you can join a neighborhood, many users add bloggers as friends instead. A neighborhood filled with members appeals to users the same as high RSS subscriber numbers. I equate this to peer pressure. If five hundred others are doing it, then I should be too.
The benefit of the neighborhoods still eludes me. I know they showcase the sites you adulate, but for me it seems somewhat redundant. I'm already adding the site owner as a contact/friend, so why would I join their neighborhood? Adding bloggers as friends seems much more productive.
A plethora of social media sites, including popular destinations like Digg, StumbleUpon, MyBlogLog, Reddit, Technorati, Facebook, and Sphinn can be tapped for more exposure. In your community section, you give your username information for these social media sites, and BlogCatalog imports all your activity into your profile. The next person to run across your BlogCatalog profile will see what you recently Dugg, Sphunn, and Twittered.
Your visitors view your most recent Diggs, Sphinns and other social media happenings in an RSS feed. This litany of current social media activity harnesses a valuable resource -- your friends' attention. By showing everyone what you just Stumbled, you're encouraging them to also Stumble those articles. If your friends take action and give the content a thumbs up, then your Stumble vote should become more influential in the community. This is just one subtle benefit of showing your social media activity.
The BlogCatalog team announced on Sunday evening, via email, that they have created a News Feed Widget. The widget can be placed anywhere on your site and it shows visitors your recent activity on all the aforementioned social media sites.
A visitor to your site can now connect to you on many different levels. They can read your content, and then follow your activity on all the various social media sites. This virtual trail can be good for some sites and not so good for others.
If nothing else, it forces us to always be aware of what we endorse. Are we a weight loss blog stumbling a site promoting unhealthy lifestyles? Do we align ourselves with Democrats on our blog then Digg a McCain lovefest article?
Of course, many users would not have these problems, but it is something to consider. Does the benefit outweigh the negatives? Can we grow our readership and our credibility as a source through these mediums?
To receive substantial traffic, you must be an active member of the BlogCatalog site. It's also a good strategy to join active neighborhoods in your niche, participate in discussions in those neighborhoods, and leave reviews for the blogs you enjoy. All this brings in traffic.
The broadcast feature is popular among bloggers. A broadcast enables you to release a message to all your friends. I've seen many of my BlogCatalog friends use this to encourage visits to their site, request diggs of a post, market a contest, and invite friends to new social media sites. I've also seen it become spam. Broadcasting stellar posts on your own site should lead to more quality visits. I usually ignore spam users and their content. There is a fine line between being annoying and being informative.
Overall I think BlogCatalog is worth the time and effort. We can grow our readership through active participation, and also find some new sites for our feed reader. The recent additions of social media surveillance may benefit some site owners, while others may enjoy the simple interaction of placing reviews for the blogs they read. The site has a lot of potential for expanding your reader base and for communicating with a wider audience.
How does BlogCatalog compare to other networking sites?
How active are you in the BlogCatalog community?
If you're not using BlogCatalog much at the moment, will this article encourage you to dig deeper into the site?